Triple
T33332764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arthur (French) |
E853450
|
entity |
| Predicate | pronouncedInIPA |
P5704
|
FINISHED |
| Object | /aʁ.tyʁ/ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: /aʁ.tyʁ/ | Statement: [Arthur (French), pronouncedInIPA, /aʁ.tyʁ/]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pronouncedInIPA Context triple: [Arthur (French), pronouncedInIPA, /aʁ.tyʁ/]
-
A.
hasIPA
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) transcription representing its pronunciation.
-
B.
isMorePronouncedIn
Indicates that a particular feature, quality, or effect appears with greater intensity or prominence in one context, entity, or condition than in another.
-
C.
typeOfPronunciationDescribed
Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the kind or style of pronunciation associated with another entity.
-
D.
correctPronunciation
Indicates that one entity provides the accurate or standard way to pronounce another entity (such as a word or name).
-
E.
hasPronunciationInformation
Indicates that there is available information describing how something is pronounced.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34969614c81909cd99661b0902533 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e3156ea48190b604e414665ef351 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de0b9ba48190887c9eb5d06a2e94 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:34 a.m.