Triple

T33304821
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lloyd Sherman E852688 entity
Predicate fictionalRegionalIdentity P196600 FINISHED
Object Southern LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Southern | Statement: [Lloyd Sherman, fictionalRegionalIdentity, Southern]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fictionalRegionalIdentity
Context triple: [Lloyd Sherman, fictionalRegionalIdentity, Southern]
  • A. fictionalEthnoCulturalIdentity
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an invented or imaginary ethnic or cultural identity, rather than a real-world one.
  • B. fictionalGeographicRegion
    Indicates that a geographic region exists only in fiction or imagination rather than in the real world.
  • C. fictionalEthnicFocus
    Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or thematically emphasizes a fictional or invented ethnic group.
  • D. fictionalSettingRegion
    Indicates that a fictional setting is located within or associated with a specific geographic or administrative region.
  • E. belongsToFictionalRegion
    Indicates that an entity is located within, associated with, or under the jurisdiction of a fictional or imaginary geographic region.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34966ed4c81908dc9dda82d8c7fe3 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe5d58c3e48190910aa3c23485e2c4 completed May 8, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe5c92090c8190bcfa412c0a3619df completed May 8, 2026, 9:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe5d580d7c819097cb18d438b01d08 completed May 8, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:33 a.m.