Triple
T3330326
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South Semitic languages |
E70016
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesLanguage |
P2177
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Soqotri |
E290162
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Soqotri | Statement: [South Semitic languages, includesLanguage, Soqotri]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Soqotri Context triple: [South Semitic languages, includesLanguage, Soqotri]
-
A.
Soqotri language
chosen
The Soqotri language is a Modern South Arabian Semitic language spoken primarily by the indigenous people of the island of Socotra in Yemen.
-
B.
Soqotri people
The Soqotri people are an indigenous ethnic group of the Socotra archipelago, known for their distinct Semitic language and unique cultural traditions shaped by the islands’ long isolation.
-
C.
Palaic
Palaic is an extinct Anatolian Indo-European language once spoken in north-central Anatolia, known primarily from limited cuneiform texts.
-
D.
Brahui
Brahui is a Dravidian language spoken primarily by the Brahui people in parts of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran.
-
E.
Dargin
Dargin is a Northeast Caucasian language spoken primarily by the Dargin people in the Republic of Dagestan in Russia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a24f208190bcf83131bfed3521 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb171ee0881908642504ab0ac8329 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:27 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b31a810e2c8190bfc206bdeb1ac5b8 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 7:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:12 p.m.