Triple
T33266692
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Satellites |
E851666
|
entity |
| Predicate | isNotableTrackOn |
P8087
|
FINISHED |
| Object | I Am... |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: I Am... | Statement: [Satellites, isNotableTrackOn, I Am...]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isNotableTrackOn Context triple: [Satellites, isNotableTrackOn, I Am...]
-
A.
notableTrack
chosen
Indicates that a particular track (such as a song or recording) is especially significant, well-known, or prominent in relation to the subject.
-
B.
isNotable
Indicates that an entity is recognized as significant, prominent, or worthy of attention within a particular context or domain.
-
C.
hasNotabilityFor
Indicates that an entity is notable, recognized, or significant specifically in relation to a given subject, context, or domain.
-
D.
notableTrackLength
Indicates that there is a track whose duration is considered significant or noteworthy in the context of the subject.
-
E.
hasNotableRecordingBy
Indicates that an entity (such as a work or composition) has a well-known or significant recording created or performed by a specified agent (such as an artist, ensemble, or label).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349642dac81908a37ffcc3b976a55 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e02ba6b881908dfafc52d3b75f1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de09c2f481909f8b2545d3208c9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:32 a.m.