Triple

T33265295
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Speed E851626 entity
Predicate hasDramaticRoleType P25662 FINISHED
Object servant-clown LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: servant-clown | Statement: [Speed, hasDramaticRoleType, servant-clown]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDramaticRoleType
Context triple: [Speed, hasDramaticRoleType, servant-clown]
  • A. dramaticRole
    Indicates that one entity serves as a character or part played by another entity within a dramatic or theatrical work.
  • B. hasFictionalRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity plays or is assigned a specific role within a fictional work or narrative.
  • C. hasPortrayedRole
    Indicates that an entity has performed or depicted a specific role or character, typically in a work such as a film, play, or television show.
  • D. creditedRoleOf
    Indicates that a particular role or position is formally acknowledged as being held or performed by a specific entity in a credit or attribution context.
  • E. hasPortrayedPersonRole
    Indicates that an entity has performed or held a specific role in portraying a particular person (e.g., in a film, play, or other representation).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349642dac81908a37ffcc3b976a55 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6f8164698819090c1b471f1caa4c6 completed May 3, 2026, 7:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f6619404819084662aef1238261c completed May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:32 a.m.