Triple

T33247572
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Matching Law E851140 entity
Predicate inBehaviorAnalysis P175935 FINISHED
Object forms basis for quantitative models of choice LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: forms basis for quantitative models of choice | Statement: [Matching Law, inBehaviorAnalysis, forms basis for quantitative models of choice]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inBehaviorAnalysis
Context triple: [Matching Law, inBehaviorAnalysis, forms basis for quantitative models of choice]
  • A. behaviorObserved
    Indicates that a particular behavior or action has been witnessed, recorded, or detected in relation to an entity or context.
  • B. privateBehavior
    Indicates behavior or actions that are intended to be kept confidential, hidden, or restricted from public or general observation.
  • C. behaviorCode
    Indicates the specific rule, standard, or classification code that governs or characterizes an entity’s behavior in a given context.
  • D. behaviorNear
    Indicates that one entity exhibits a behavior or action in close spatial proximity to another entity.
  • E. analysisMode
    Indicates that an entity is operating under a specific analytical configuration or method for processing or evaluating information.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34962386c81909ddc3bf9e18ddeb8 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6db3606808190a80c6e9f5da5b33e completed May 3, 2026, 5:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d82fef788190b9ad19a36c0312dc completed May 3, 2026, 5:08 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6daa2fc0c8190b84f018abe8baa6a completed May 3, 2026, 5:18 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:31 a.m.