Triple
T33211181
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Florida Board on Judicial Conduct |
E850163
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | disciplinary authority for judges |
C38202
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: disciplinary authority for judges Context triple: [Florida Board on Judicial Conduct, instanceOf, disciplinary authority for judges]
-
A.
Designating authority for special courts
The designating authority for special courts is the entity legally empowered to establish, appoint, or assign judges and jurisdictions to specialized judicial bodies for handling particular categories of cases.
-
B.
disciplinary authority
chosen
Disciplinary authority is the legitimate power granted to an individual or body within an organization or institution to set rules, monitor behavior, and impose sanctions or corrective measures in response to misconduct or noncompliance.
-
C.
Court scholar
A court scholar is an educated advisor within a royal or noble court who provides expertise in literature, philosophy, history, and governance to inform political and cultural decisions.
-
D.
judicial discipline system
A judicial discipline system is a formal framework of rules, procedures, and oversight mechanisms designed to investigate, evaluate, and sanction misconduct or ethical violations by judges to maintain integrity and public confidence in the judiciary.
-
E.
judicial advisory committee
A judicial advisory committee is a group of appointed experts and stakeholders that provides recommendations and guidance to the judiciary on matters such as court administration, procedural rules, and judicial policy.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495fb92c819083ce65d0ddee7a76 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:30 a.m.