Triple
T33210043
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Troy Phelan |
E850127
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalFocusOf |
P197905
|
FINISHED |
| Object | probate litigation in The Testament |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: probate litigation in The Testament | Statement: [Troy Phelan, legalFocusOf, probate litigation in The Testament]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalFocusOf Context triple: [Troy Phelan, legalFocusOf, probate litigation in The Testament]
-
A.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
B.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
-
C.
legalFeature
Indicates that something possesses a specific legal characteristic, status, or attribute relevant to laws or regulations.
-
D.
legalInstrumentFocus
chosen
Indicates that the primary subject or emphasis of a legal instrument (such as a law, contract, or regulation) is directed toward a particular entity or matter.
-
E.
legalScope
Indicates the range, boundaries, or extent of authority, applicability, or effect that something has under a particular legal framework or rule.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495fb92c819083ce65d0ddee7a76 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff1ba8694481909ceb36f26ca85612 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff1b27f0f08190a9e74308c5b3d1ba |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:30 a.m.