Triple

T33209847
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nicholas Easter E850121 entity
Predicate hasFictionalPartner P192977 FINISHED
Object Marlee NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marlee | Statement: [Nicholas Easter, hasFictionalPartner, Marlee]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalPartner
Context triple: [Nicholas Easter, hasFictionalPartner, Marlee]
  • A. hasHumanPartnerCharacter
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a partner character who is human.
  • B. hasFictionalRomanticInterest chosen
    Indicates that one entity is portrayed as having a romantic attraction or interest toward another entity within a fictional context.
  • C. romanticPartnerInSpinOff
    Indicates that two characters are depicted as romantic partners specifically within a spin-off work, rather than (or in addition to) the original series.
  • D. romanticPartnerInSeries
    Indicates that one character is portrayed as a romantic partner of another character within the context of a specific series or narrative.
  • E. hasFictionalCompanion
    Indicates that one entity has another entity as its fictional companion, typically within a narrative or imaginative context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3495fb92c819083ce65d0ddee7a76 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff109695008190a22b47ef8be2e3f9 completed May 9, 2026, 10:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff0f243ea88190970d2c520b55c816 completed May 9, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:30 a.m.