Triple
T33186484
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Electronic Product Code |
E849483
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicallyEncodedIn |
—
|
GENERATED |
| Object | RFID tags |
—
|
UNRECOGNIZED GENERATED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicallyEncodedIn Context triple: [Electronic Product Code, typicallyEncodedIn, RFID tags]
-
A.
encodedIn
Indicates that one entity is represented, stored, or expressed within another entity using a specific encoding or format.
-
B.
notEncodedIn
Indicates that a piece of information, data, or content is explicitly absent from or not represented within a given encoding, format, or medium.
-
C.
typicalEncoding
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the standard or most common encoding or representation format used for another entity.
-
D.
encodes
Indicates that one entity contains or represents the information, instructions, or structure of another in a coded or symbolic form.
-
E.
encodingIs
Indicates that one entity serves as the specific encoding or coded representation of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495e0f108190a6a7006f79f9c2c3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:29 a.m.