Triple
T33173690
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William D. Newbold |
E849104
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasClaimEvaluatedAs |
P184492
|
FINISHED |
| Object | discredited by later Voynich researchers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: discredited by later Voynich researchers | Statement: [William D. Newbold, hasClaimEvaluatedAs, discredited by later Voynich researchers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasClaimEvaluatedAs Context triple: [William D. Newbold, hasClaimEvaluatedAs, discredited by later Voynich researchers]
-
A.
hasEvaluation
chosen
Indicates that an entity has been assessed or judged according to some criteria, linking it to the corresponding evaluation result or record.
-
B.
hasClaimOn
Indicates that one entity holds a right, entitlement, or demand over another entity or its resources.
-
C.
hasClaimsOperationsIn
Indicates that an entity performs, manages, or is responsible for claims-related operations within a specified location, region, or organizational unit.
-
D.
hasEvaluationType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific kind or category of evaluation applied to it.
-
E.
hasClaimType
Indicates that an entity is associated with or categorized under a specific type of claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495be8808190bbf427733df08aad |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd389cb28c819099a77e28d25f258a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd3826d8048190ada79a5868d1d7f3 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:29 a.m.