Triple
T33155399
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nikhil |
E848558
|
entity |
| Predicate | ideologicalViewsDifferFrom |
P18907
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sandip |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sandip | Statement: [Nikhil, ideologicalViewsDifferFrom, Sandip]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ideologicalViewsDifferFrom Context triple: [Nikhil, ideologicalViewsDifferFrom, Sandip]
-
A.
recognizesIdeologicalDiversity
Indicates that one entity acknowledges and affirms the existence and legitimacy of a range of differing ideological perspectives within a group, context, or system.
-
B.
hasIdeologicalConflict
Indicates a relationship where two entities hold opposing or incompatible ideologies that put them in conflict with each other.
-
C.
hasIdeologicalPosition
Indicates that an entity holds, endorses, or is associated with a particular ideological stance or viewpoint.
-
D.
opposingIdeology
chosen
Indicates that two entities hold conflicting or mutually incompatible belief systems, doctrines, or ideological positions.
-
E.
reflectsPoliticalViewsOf
Indicates that one entity’s opinions, statements, or representations express or mirror the political views held by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495b02d08190bb3d366823dffc21 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6db6af1d88190989810182354d60f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d82d068c8190940a3200ed760e38 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:07 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:28 a.m.