Triple

T33125065
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Book I E847698 entity
Predicate workLanguageFeature P5192 FINISHED
Object multilingual wordplay LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multilingual wordplay | Statement: [Book I, workLanguageFeature, multilingual wordplay]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workLanguageFeature
Context triple: [Book I, workLanguageFeature, multilingual wordplay]
  • A. languageFeature chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a characteristic, property, or capability of a language associated with the other entity.
  • B. workLanguageVariant
    Indicates that one language variant of a work is related to another version of the same work, typically differing by language or localization.
  • C. usesLanguageSupport
    Indicates that one entity makes use of language-related assistance, features, or services provided by another entity.
  • D. languageProvision
    Indicates that one entity supplies, supports, or makes available a particular language (or set of languages) for use by another entity.
  • E. languagesUsed
    Indicates that one entity uses, employs, or is expressed in one or more languages associated with the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349588f088190b7c9588860f72033 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d71f3d00819088efa93eac76e17b completed May 3, 2026, 5:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d27224708190b31a541cebe0ff77 completed May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:27 a.m.