Triple
T33114616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Orillia waterfront |
E847424
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasManagementBy |
P104809
|
FINISHED |
| Object | City of Orillia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Orillia | Statement: [Orillia waterfront, hasManagementBy, City of Orillia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasManagementBy Context triple: [Orillia waterfront, hasManagementBy, City of Orillia]
-
A.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
B.
hasTypeOfManagement
Indicates that an entity is associated with or operates under a specified form or style of management.
-
C.
hasManagementFeature
Indicates that an entity includes or supports a capability specifically intended for managing, controlling, or administering another entity or process.
-
D.
managementIs
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds a managerial role, responsibility, or authority over another entity.
-
E.
isManagedThrough
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or operated by means of another entity, typically specifying the mechanism, channel, or system used for its management.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495751a081909850af5843da40dc |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00c3362dcc819096e49b882709fddd |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00c2e5cdd88190a5f2d0f6a843cd56 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:39 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:27 a.m.