Triple
T33113779
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crimes of the Future (1970 film) |
E847401
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDirectorStyleTrait |
P70207
|
FINISHED |
| Object | clinical tone |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: clinical tone | Statement: [Crimes of the Future (1970 film), hasDirectorStyleTrait, clinical tone]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDirectorStyleTrait Context triple: [Crimes of the Future (1970 film), hasDirectorStyleTrait, clinical tone]
-
A.
directorialStyle
Indicates the characteristic manner or approach a director consistently uses in creating and shaping their works.
-
B.
directedInStyle
chosen
Indicates that a work was directed in a particular stylistic manner or according to a specific directing style.
-
C.
hasFilmStyle
Indicates that a film exhibits or is characterized by a particular cinematic style or aesthetic approach.
-
D.
hasTheatricalStyle
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular theatrical style associated with another entity.
-
E.
hasDirectorTrademark
Indicates that a director holds a registered trademark associated with them or their work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495751a081909850af5843da40dc |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fecb4d02f881909a9ee97ce98000d5 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fec9846c1c8190b317f0711f0755db |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:43 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:27 a.m.