Triple

T33112662
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Telcontar E847370 entity
Predicate namedAfterEpithetOf P12247 FINISHED
Object Aragorn II Elessar NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aragorn II Elessar | Statement: [Telcontar, namedAfterEpithetOf, Aragorn II Elessar]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: namedAfterEpithetOf
Context triple: [Telcontar, namedAfterEpithetOf, Aragorn II Elessar]
  • A. epithetAppliedBy
    Indicates that a particular epithet or descriptive label is used or assigned by a specific agent to a target entity.
  • B. epithetOrTitle
    Indicates that one entity serves as an epithet, honorific, or formal title used to designate or characterize another entity.
  • C. namedAccordingTo
    Indicates that one entity is given a name that follows, references, or is derived from another entity or source.
  • D. honorificEponym chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as an honorific namesake for another, typically recognizing or commemorating the person or entity in whose honor something is named.
  • E. eponymFor
    Indicates that one entity gives its name to another entity, which is then named after it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3495751a081909850af5843da40dc completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7b5ccbda481908fe1945c35e36ce8 completed May 3, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7b4c06f5881908f0b98cad6796478 completed May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:27 a.m.