Triple
T33093511
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slinky |
E846845
|
entity |
| Predicate | wasPreviouslyOwnedBy |
P59297
|
FINISHED |
| Object | James Industries |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: James Industries | Statement: [Slinky, wasPreviouslyOwnedBy, James Industries]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasPreviouslyOwnedBy Context triple: [Slinky, wasPreviouslyOwnedBy, James Industries]
-
A.
previouslyPossessedBy
chosen
Indicates that an entity was owned or possessed by another entity at some time in the past, but is not necessarily possessed by that entity now.
-
B.
formerPartOwnerOf
Indicates that an entity previously held, but no longer holds, a partial ownership stake in another entity.
-
C.
probableOriginalOwner
Indicates that one entity is likely, though not certainly, the original owner or possessor of another entity.
-
D.
wasFirstHeldBy
Indicates that an event or activity was initially hosted, organized, or conducted by a particular entity.
-
E.
hasOwnerWhoLaterOwned
Indicates that an entity is owned by someone who, at a later time, also became the owner of another specified entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495590dc8190aa04f3dec74ce976 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d6a6b04c8190bee4cf9c00665ef7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d27120988190aacec621cf2bf0e8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:26 a.m.