Triple
T33090310
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lila Neugebauer |
E846761
|
entity |
| Predicate | directedPerformanceOf |
P194263
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Elaine May in The Waverly Gallery |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Elaine May in The Waverly Gallery | Statement: [Lila Neugebauer, directedPerformanceOf, Elaine May in The Waverly Gallery]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: directedPerformanceOf Context triple: [Lila Neugebauer, directedPerformanceOf, Elaine May in The Waverly Gallery]
-
A.
performedTo
Indicates that an action or performance is directed toward or carried out on a particular entity.
-
B.
depictedPerforming
Indicates that one entity is shown or illustrated as carrying out an action or activity.
-
C.
intendedForPerformanceBy
Indicates that something (such as a work, role, or piece) is designed or meant to be performed by a particular performer or type of performer.
-
D.
performedWith
Indicates that an action or activity is carried out using, accompanied by, or in conjunction with a specified entity or instrument.
-
E.
forPerformanceBy
Indicates that something is intended, designed, or suitable to be performed by a particular agent or performer.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495590dc8190aa04f3dec74ce976 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd68abf52881909c5a390c362b7c59 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd6812d0c88190930d8fa2d4b92490 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd68ab21a0819096bfc4a8c14851ad |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:38 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:26 a.m.