Triple

T33088612
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tirpitz risk theory E846710 entity
Predicate targetedAdversary P196509 FINISHED
Object United Kingdom NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United Kingdom | Statement: [Tirpitz risk theory, targetedAdversary, United Kingdom]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: targetedAdversary
Context triple: [Tirpitz risk theory, targetedAdversary, United Kingdom]
  • A. commonAdversary
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same opponent, rival, or threat.
  • B. targetOfThreat
    Indicates that one entity is the recipient or intended victim of a threat made by another entity.
  • C. targetedBecauseOf
    Indicates that one entity is made a target of an action, harm, or scrutiny specifically due to possessing a particular attribute, identity, or characteristic.
  • D. targetedForce
    Indicates a deliberate application of force directed at a specific target or entity.
  • E. otherAdversary
    Indicates that one entity is an adversary of another, distinct from any primary or previously identified adversary.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3495590dc8190aa04f3dec74ce976 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe59d11e9881909d2f33b7c717030e completed May 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe394fdfbc8190a931926ae3635cbf completed May 8, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe59d03a648190bbe846cb5730a477 completed May 8, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:26 a.m.