Triple
T33074854
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Havre–Caumartin (Paris Métro) |
E846330
|
entity |
| Predicate | connectedByCorridorTo |
P156541
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Auber (RER) station |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Auber (RER) station | Statement: [Havre–Caumartin (Paris Métro), connectedByCorridorTo, Auber (RER) station]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectedByCorridorTo Context triple: [Havre–Caumartin (Paris Métro), connectedByCorridorTo, Auber (RER) station]
-
A.
linkedByCorridor
chosen
Indicates that two locations are directly connected to each other by a corridor.
-
B.
hasCorridor
Indicates that one entity includes, is connected by, or provides access through a corridor to another entity.
-
C.
connectedByStraitTo
Indicates that one entity is geographically linked to another by a narrow body of water known as a strait.
-
D.
onCorridorBetween
Indicates that one entity is located along the corridor that lies between two other reference entities or areas.
-
E.
isPartOfCorridorSystem
Indicates that one entity forms a component or segment within a larger interconnected corridor system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495405b88190967af2157b43b896 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feff70fbec8190b1ff5f943f29613e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fefbcd5b7881909cfe52b32f8a4301 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:18 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:25 a.m.