Triple
T33074141
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ramatkal |
E846312
|
entity |
| Predicate | isTopCommanderOf |
P125208
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Israel Defense Forces |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Israel Defense Forces | Statement: [Ramatkal, isTopCommanderOf, Israel Defense Forces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isTopCommanderOf Context triple: [Ramatkal, isTopCommanderOf, Israel Defense Forces]
-
A.
hasCommanderRank
Indicates that an entity holds the military or organizational rank of commander within a specified hierarchy or context.
-
B.
isSeniorMostCommanderOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds the highest level of command authority over another entity, surpassing all other commanders in rank or seniority.
-
C.
hasCommander
Indicates that one entity serves as the commanding officer or leader of another entity.
-
D.
chiefLieutenantOf
Indicates that one person serves as the primary subordinate or top-ranking assistant to another leader or authority figure.
-
E.
hasCommandant
Indicates that an entity is under the authority or leadership of a specific commandant.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495405b88190967af2157b43b896 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e02ba6b881908dfafc52d3b75f1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de09c2f481909f8b2545d3208c9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:25 a.m.