Triple
T33073583
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dehgal Pashayi |
E846300
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pashayi language variety |
C26013
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Pashayi language variety Context triple: [Dehgal Pashayi, instanceOf, Pashayi language variety]
-
A.
Dargwa language variety
A Dargwa language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Dargwa language, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Dargwa linguistic continuum.
-
B.
Luri language variety
A Luri language variety is a specific regional or social form of the Luri language, distinguished by its own characteristic phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader continuum of Southwestern Iranian dialects.
-
C.
Yana language variety
Yana language variety refers to any of the related but distinct forms of the Yana language traditionally spoken by the Yana people of northern California, encompassing dialectal differences in phonology, vocabulary, and grammar.
-
D.
regional variety of the Kumyk language
A regional variety of the Kumyk language is a geographically defined form of Kumyk that exhibits distinct phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Kumyk dialects.
-
E.
Pamir language
chosen
The Pamir language is a group of Eastern Iranian languages spoken in the high-mountain Pamir region of Tajikistan, Afghanistan, and surrounding areas, characterized by significant diversity and archaic linguistic features.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495405b88190967af2157b43b896 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:25 a.m.