Triple
T33063077
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TLPA |
E846023
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | writing system for spoken language |
C318
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: writing system for spoken language Context triple: [TLPA, instanceOf, writing system for spoken language]
-
A.
writing system
chosen
A writing system is an organized set of visual symbols and rules used to represent the elements of a language in a permanent, readable form.
-
B.
automatic speech recognition system
An automatic speech recognition system converts spoken language into written text by analyzing and interpreting audio signals using acoustic, linguistic, and statistical models.
-
C.
Osage-language writing system
The Osage-language writing system is a modern, standardized orthography, including a unique alphabet, designed specifically to represent the sounds and structure of the Osage language accurately and support its revitalization.
-
D.
writing system reform
Writing system reform is the deliberate modification or replacement of a language’s script, spelling rules, or orthographic conventions to improve usability, consistency, or alignment with contemporary linguistic and social needs.
-
E.
indigenous writing system
An indigenous writing system is a set of symbols and rules for written communication that originates from, is developed by, and reflects the linguistic and cultural practices of a specific native or aboriginal community.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3495333b8819095e9af56855b9061 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:25 a.m.