Triple

T33050878
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Celestius E845716 entity
Predicate advocatedDoctrine P41206 FINISHED
Object free will LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: free will | Statement: [Celestius, advocatedDoctrine, free will]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: advocatedDoctrine
Context triple: [Celestius, advocatedDoctrine, free will]
  • A. doctrineOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
  • B. proposesDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or advocates a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles for consideration or adoption by others.
  • C. encouragedDoctrine
    Indicates that an entity actively promoted or urged others to adopt or follow a particular doctrine or set of beliefs.
  • D. doctrinalDomain
    Indicates the specific area of doctrine or body of teachings within which a belief, statement, or rule is classified.
  • E. clarifiedDoctrineOn
    Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3495242e48190996a2cb2beab5455 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d6a6b04c8190bee4cf9c00665ef7 completed May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d27120988190aacec621cf2bf0e8 completed May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:24 a.m.