Triple
T33027549
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | STOU |
E845081
|
entity |
| Predicate | clientProvides |
P175711
|
FINISHED |
| Object | data to be stored |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: data to be stored | Statement: [STOU, clientProvides, data to be stored]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clientProvides Context triple: [STOU, clientProvides, data to be stored]
-
A.
providesSupportTo
Indicates that one entity offers help, resources, or reinforcement to another entity to aid its function, stability, or success.
-
B.
believedToProvide
Indicates that something is thought or assumed to offer or supply a particular benefit, effect, or resource.
-
C.
providesFunctionalityOf
Indicates that one entity supplies, implements, or makes available the capabilities or functions that are normally associated with another entity.
-
D.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
E.
supportedAs
Indicates that one entity is accepted, recognized, or treated as being in the role, type, or representation of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34950749c8190ae05cd27adb16d58 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d74b20a48190900dda1014cc13a8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6d27120988190aacec621cf2bf0e8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6d6a482fc8190b526291cd99b8696 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:23 a.m.