Triple
T33027450
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PASV |
E845079
|
entity |
| Predicate | initiatorOfDataConnection |
P88942
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FTP client |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FTP client | Statement: [PASV, initiatorOfDataConnection, FTP client]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: initiatorOfDataConnection Context triple: [PASV, initiatorOfDataConnection, FTP client]
-
A.
initiatorAuthentication
Indicates that an entity is responsible for verifying and establishing the identity of the party that initiates an action or request.
-
B.
initiatesExchangeWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity starts or triggers an exchange or transaction with another entity.
-
C.
openedInConnectionWith
Indicates that one entity was opened as a direct result of, or in association with, another specific event, action, or entity.
-
D.
initiatorKnows
Indicates that the initiating entity possesses knowledge or awareness of the other entity or of the action/event in question.
-
E.
connectionDirection
Indicates the directional flow or orientation of a connection from one entity to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34950749c8190ae05cd27adb16d58 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7c777e924819081a6634f549fe552 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7c475c58c8190a883554231e88c88 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:23 a.m.