Triple

T33027346
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ACCT E845076 entity
Predicate statusCodeOnFailure P175713 FINISHED
Object 530 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 530 | Statement: [ACCT, statusCodeOnFailure, 530]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusCodeOnFailure
Context triple: [ACCT, statusCodeOnFailure, 530]
  • A. failureResponseCodeExample chosen
    Indicates the example HTTP status code that should be returned when the related operation fails.
  • B. statusInHTTP3
    Indicates the HTTP/3 protocol status or condition associated with a given resource, request, or connection.
  • C. statusInHTTP2
    Indicates the HTTP/2 status or condition associated with a request/response exchange, such as success, error, or protocol-specific state.
  • D. errorStatusSemantics
    Indicates how the meaning or interpretation of an error status value should be understood within a given context or system.
  • E. definesStatusCode
    Indicates that one entity specifies or assigns the status code used to represent the condition or outcome of another entity or process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34950749c8190ae05cd27adb16d58 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fecd0a732c819097bdd3eb69b6158c completed May 9, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fecc0318d481908b5b20598a76a9fe completed May 9, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:23 a.m.