Triple

T33025081
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alabama Centennial half dollar E845016 entity
Predicate mintageTotal P25403 FINISHED
Object approximately 64,000 pieces LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 64,000 pieces | Statement: [Alabama Centennial half dollar, mintageTotal, approximately 64,000 pieces]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mintageTotal
Context triple: [Alabama Centennial half dollar, mintageTotal, approximately 64,000 pieces]
  • A. mintageType
    Indicates the specific method or category of production used when minting a coin or similar numismatic item.
  • B. coinsProduced chosen
    Indicates that a particular entity (such as a mint or authority) has produced or issued a specified set or quantity of coins.
  • C. yearsOfMinting
    Indicates the span of years during which an item (such as a coin or stamp) was actively produced or issued.
  • D. denominationDepicted
    Indicates that an item visually represents or shows the monetary denomination (value) of a currency.
  • E. producedCirculatingCoinageWithoutMintMark
    Indicates that an entity created circulating coinage that does not bear a mint mark identifying its place of manufacture.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34950749c8190ae05cd27adb16d58 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d74b20a48190900dda1014cc13a8 completed May 3, 2026, 5:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d26f27dc8190ae426a3e1573933e completed May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:23 a.m.