Triple
T33023740
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Non‑aldermanic Sheriff |
E844979
|
entity |
| Predicate | sharesDutiesWith |
P56398
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aldermanic Sheriff |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aldermanic Sheriff | Statement: [Non‑aldermanic Sheriff, sharesDutiesWith, aldermanic Sheriff]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesDutiesWith Context triple: [Non‑aldermanic Sheriff, sharesDutiesWith, aldermanic Sheriff]
-
A.
hasResponsibilitiesSharedWith
chosen
Indicates that two or more entities share joint responsibility for certain tasks, duties, or obligations.
-
B.
sharesWorkWith
Indicates that one entity collaborates or participates jointly in work or tasks with another entity.
-
C.
sharesCustodyWith
Indicates that two or more parties jointly hold legal responsibility and decision-making authority for the care and upbringing of the same dependent, typically a child.
-
D.
sharesPowerWith
Indicates that two or more entities jointly hold, exercise, or distribute authority or control in a shared manner.
-
E.
sharesFateWith
Indicates that two or more entities are bound to experience the same outcome, destiny, or consequences.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34950749c8190ae05cd27adb16d58 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff90b673248190b4dda9e005642d17 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff8d5bee1081909274052945e98a6f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:39 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:23 a.m.