Triple

T32997229
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Maria Cantwell E844261 entity
Predicate hasPreviousOccupation P107616 FINISHED
Object business executive LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: business executive | Statement: [Maria Cantwell, hasPreviousOccupation, business executive]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPreviousOccupation
Context triple: [Maria Cantwell, hasPreviousOccupation, business executive]
  • A. hasPastOccupation chosen
    Indicates that an entity previously held a particular job, role, or occupation in the past.
  • B. earlierOccupation
    Indicates that one occupation held by an entity occurred before another occupation in that entity’s work history.
  • C. hadOccupationStatusUntil
    Indicates that an entity held a particular occupational status up to, but not necessarily beyond, a specified point in time.
  • D. memberLaterOccupation
    Indicates that an individual later held a particular occupation or position after an earlier point in time or role.
  • E. resumedOccupation
    Indicates that an entity has returned to and continued a previous occupation or role after a period of interruption or absence.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3494d99988190b502c68926af2c4d completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a013c50bcb8819086d163f1a796a9b8 completed May 11, 2026, 2:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a013c01bac88190b15c70910c02a8a7 completed May 11, 2026, 2:16 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:22 a.m.