Triple
T32987025
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UTCR |
E843973
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeSupplementedBy |
P17547
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Oregon circuit court local rules |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oregon circuit court local rules | Statement: [UTCR, mayBeSupplementedBy, Oregon circuit court local rules]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeSupplementedBy Context triple: [UTCR, mayBeSupplementedBy, Oregon circuit court local rules]
-
A.
hasSupplement
Indicates that one entity provides or is associated with an additional supporting or enhancing item, resource, or component for another entity.
-
B.
laterComplementedBy
Indicates that an earlier entity is subsequently supplemented, enhanced, or completed by a later entity.
-
C.
canBeAugmentedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of being enhanced, expanded, or supplemented by another entity.
-
D.
mayAlsoInclude
Indicates that something can optionally contain or encompass additional elements beyond those primarily specified.
-
E.
mayBeReplacedBy
Indicates that one entity can potentially be substituted or superseded by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3494c6f9c8190a255409fce8b1d3b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7805ce6208190ac6dbd9c97989978 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f77956ec648190ba4fb7e9d83fd107 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:22 a.m.