Triple
T32979045
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jesus |
E843746
|
entity |
| Predicate | underRomanOfficial |
P192162
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pontius Pilate |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pontius Pilate | Statement: [Jesus, underRomanOfficial, Pontius Pilate]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underRomanOfficial Context triple: [Jesus, underRomanOfficial, Pontius Pilate]
-
A.
underRomanRule
Indicates that one entity was politically controlled or governed by the Roman state or its authorities.
-
B.
underRomanEmperor
Indicates that one entity existed, occurred, or was governed during the reign of the specified Roman emperor.
-
C.
allyOfRome
Indicates a relationship where one entity is politically or militarily aligned with, and offers support or cooperation to, Rome.
-
D.
sideRoman
Indicates that one entity is located on the Roman (Latin-script) side or version of another entity, typically in contrast to a non-Roman or alternative script side.
-
E.
romanNomen
Indicates that an entity has a specific Roman nomen, i.e., the clan or gens name within the traditional Roman naming system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3494c6f9c8190a255409fce8b1d3b |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcf825ca7081909d06b0df33eb33f9 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcf42160f0819096812a8bf590875e |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:20 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcf82405c88190a19cecf8e9cc272d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:22 a.m.