Triple

T32971702
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Let's Just Say It Wasn't Pretty E843535 entity
Predicate previousWorkByAuthor P198266 FINISHED
Object Then Again NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Then Again | Statement: [Let's Just Say It Wasn't Pretty, previousWorkByAuthor, Then Again]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousWorkByAuthor
Context triple: [Let's Just Say It Wasn't Pretty, previousWorkByAuthor, Then Again]
  • A. previousWorkByArtist
    Indicates that the related work was created earlier by the same artist as the current or reference work.
  • B. previousWorkByProducer
    Indicates that a work was created earlier by the same producer responsible for another referenced work.
  • C. authorOfPreviousWork
    Indicates that one entity is the creator or writer of an earlier work referenced or built upon by another entity.
  • D. revisitsWorkByAuthor
    Indicates that an entity returns to and engages again with a work created by a particular author.
  • E. publishedWorksBy
    Indicates that one entity has created works that have been made publicly available by another entity (such as an author’s works published by a publisher).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3494b9fc48190bb61c955ba471275 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fed6da0390819096b88ef4714b144e completed May 9, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fed53517d081909966f31707625f1a completed May 9, 2026, 6:33 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fed6d90f2081909cd21e5e973a6b89 completed May 9, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:21 a.m.