Triple

T32965049
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject conservative Hegelianism E843344 entity
Predicate interpretsReligionAs P28250 FINISHED
Object supportive of the rational state LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: supportive of the rational state | Statement: [conservative Hegelianism, interpretsReligionAs, supportive of the rational state]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interpretsReligionAs
Context triple: [conservative Hegelianism, interpretsReligionAs, supportive of the rational state]
  • A. definesReligionAs
    Indicates that one entity specifies or assigns the religious affiliation, tradition, or belief system of another entity.
  • B. religiousSpectrum
    Indicates a relationship that places entities along a range or continuum of religious belief, practice, or affiliation.
  • C. religionOrBelief
    Indicates that one entity holds, practices, or is associated with a particular religion, faith, or belief system.
  • D. portraysReligionAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity represents, depicts, or characterizes a religion in a particular way.
  • E. theologicalInterpretation
    Indicates a relationship where an event, text, or phenomenon is understood or explained through religious or doctrinal beliefs and principles.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3494af2808190ad98cec2f1bc0fe6 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd884cb2b48190b6acd473430d9e19 completed May 8, 2026, 6:53 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8709ca208190a8bab836f0156af5 completed May 8, 2026, 6:47 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:21 a.m.