Triple
T32959295
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oostelijke Ourthe |
E843187
|
entity |
| Predicate | behoortTot |
P109922
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ardense rivierstelsel |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ardense rivierstelsel | Statement: [Oostelijke Ourthe, behoortTot, Ardense rivierstelsel]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: behoortTot Context triple: [Oostelijke Ourthe, behoortTot, Ardense rivierstelsel]
-
A.
appartientÀ
chosen
Indicates that one entity belongs to, is a member of, or is part of another entity.
-
B.
believedToBelongTo
Indicates that something is thought or assumed, but not definitively known, to be owned by or part of a particular entity.
-
C.
canBelongTo
Indicates that something is capable of being a member or part of a particular group, category, or owner.
-
D.
hasPartIn
Indicates that an entity participates in or plays a role within a larger event, process, or composite entity.
-
E.
proposedToBelongTo
Indicates that one entity has been suggested or put forward as potentially belonging to, or being a member/part of, another entity or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3494af2808190ad98cec2f1bc0fe6 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d17799888190a57b3e104bf5da6a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe5f93c8190995c53dbbe380a32 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:21 a.m.