Triple
T32940514
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maylandia zebra |
E842651
|
entity |
| Predicate | ecologicalGroup |
P16820
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mbuna |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mbuna | Statement: [Maylandia zebra, ecologicalGroup, mbuna]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ecologicalGroup Context triple: [Maylandia zebra, ecologicalGroup, mbuna]
-
A.
taxonGroup
chosen
Indicates a classification relationship where one taxon is grouped within or associated with a broader taxonomic group.
-
B.
ecologicalRoles
Indicates the various functional relationships or roles an entity plays within an ecosystem, such as its contributions to energy flow, nutrient cycling, or species interactions.
-
C.
notableSpeciesGroup
Indicates that an entity is a significant or characteristic member of a particular species group associated with another entity.
-
D.
partOfEcosystem
Indicates that an entity functions as a component within a larger ecological system, contributing to and affected by its interactions and processes.
-
E.
ecologicalStatus
Indicates the condition or health of an ecosystem or environment, often in terms of its quality, integrity, or degree of disturbance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34949727c81909d195c97de3341c8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d110773c8190a1d22fdae038102f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe5f93c8190995c53dbbe380a32 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:20 a.m.