Triple

T32928924
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Recorder of Newcastle E842346 entity
Predicate isSeniorJudicialOfficer P175407 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Recorder of Newcastle, isSeniorJudicialOfficer, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSeniorJudicialOfficer
Context triple: [Recorder of Newcastle, isSeniorJudicialOfficer, true]
  • A. hasSeniorJudge
    Indicates that one entity is assigned or linked to another entity serving in the role of a senior judge.
  • B. isSeniorLegalOfficerFor
    Indicates that one person holds a senior legal authority or leadership role with primary legal responsibility for another entity (such as an organization, unit, or individual).
  • C. hasSeniorCourt
    Indicates that one court is hierarchically subordinate to another court that serves as its senior or higher-level authority.
  • D. hasPrincipalJudge
    Indicates that one entity serves as the main or presiding judge for another entity, such as a court or judicial body.
  • E. hasJudicialOfficer
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or served by a specific judicial officer (such as a judge or magistrate) responsible for legal or court-related functions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34948adfc8190a937f1f622783c0b completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d1d916f881909575c2b22c416a5b completed May 3, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6cfe5f93c8190995c53dbbe380a32 completed May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6d0d331dc8190be5aa6bfc6365e67 completed May 3, 2026, 4:36 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:20 a.m.