Triple
T32920127
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Xinhua Xiang |
E842120
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional variety of Xiang Chinese |
C58681
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of Xiang Chinese Context triple: [Xinhua Xiang, instanceOf, regional variety of Xiang Chinese]
-
A.
regional variety of Yue Chinese
A regional variety of Yue Chinese is a localized form of the Yue branch of Sinitic languages, characterized by distinct phonological, lexical, and syntactic features specific to a particular geographic area.
-
B.
regional variety of Siwu language
A regional variety of the Siwu language is a geographically and socially distinct form of Siwu characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar from other Siwu-speaking areas.
-
C.
Old Xiang dialect
chosen
Old Xiang dialect is a conservative branch of the Xiang group of Chinese dialects, primarily spoken in central Hunan province, that preserves many archaic phonological and lexical features lost in other modern Chinese varieties.
-
D.
Hakka dialect
Hakka dialect is a group of closely related Sinitic varieties spoken primarily by the Hakka people, characterized by distinct phonology, vocabulary, and grammar that set it apart from Mandarin, Cantonese, and other Chinese dialects.
-
E.
regional variety of the Wa language
A regional variety of the Wa language is a distinct local form of Wa, characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features associated with a specific geographic area or community.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3494779388190a5d3e97f92278be2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:19 a.m.