Triple
T32895996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | More Adventurous |
E841474
|
entity |
| Predicate | exploresThemes |
P91427
|
FINISHED |
| Object | relationships |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relationships | Statement: [More Adventurous, exploresThemes, relationships]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exploresThemes Context triple: [More Adventurous, exploresThemes, relationships]
-
A.
themeExplores
Indicates that a work, action, or discourse centrally examines, investigates, or delves into a particular theme or subject.
-
B.
culturalThemes
Indicates that there is a relationship between entities where one embodies, expresses, or is associated with particular cultural themes present in or derived from the other.
-
C.
tacklesTheme
chosen
Indicates that one entity addresses, explores, or deals with a particular theme as a central subject.
-
D.
thematicConcept
Indicates that one entity embodies, expresses, or is centrally concerned with a particular underlying theme or conceptual idea represented by the other entity.
-
E.
influencesThemeOf
Indicates that one entity affects, shapes, or contributes to the thematic content or underlying message of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34945ae408190b72d8118c83beb77 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e02ba6b881908dfafc52d3b75f1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de09c2f481909f8b2545d3208c9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:18 a.m.