Triple

T32893428
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject U.S. Route 91 E841399 entity
Predicate formerConnects P19343 FINISHED
Object Los Angeles area NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Los Angeles area | Statement: [U.S. Route 91, formerConnects, Los Angeles area]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerConnects
Context triple: [U.S. Route 91, formerConnects, Los Angeles area]
  • A. formerlyConnectedTo chosen
    Indicates that two entities were once connected or associated in some way, but that connection no longer exists.
  • B. modernConnects
    Indicates a contemporary or up-to-date form of connection or linkage established between two entities.
  • C. formerNetwork
    Indicates that an entity was previously part of, or affiliated with, a particular network but is no longer currently associated with it.
  • D. formerNorthernConnection
    Indicates that a prior relationship or linkage existed in the past between entities located in, associated with, or part of a northern region, but that connection no longer holds.
  • E. connectsTo
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or joined to another, allowing interaction, communication, or transfer between them.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34945ae408190b72d8118c83beb77 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff9e91bba08190af04b31ad815b13a completed May 9, 2026, 8:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff9e00e4808190bde8f07e6519a72c completed May 9, 2026, 8:50 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:18 a.m.