Triple
T32891532
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Isabella |
E841343
|
entity |
| Predicate | approximateDateOfCompositionOfWork |
P6964
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1603–1604 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1603–1604 | Statement: [Isabella, approximateDateOfCompositionOfWork, 1603–1604]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approximateDateOfCompositionOfWork Context triple: [Isabella, approximateDateOfCompositionOfWork, 1603–1604]
-
A.
approximateYearWritten
Indicates the estimated calendar year in which something was written, when the exact year is not known.
-
B.
dateOfComposition
chosen
Indicates the calendar date or time period when a particular work was created or composed.
-
C.
hasUnknownExactDateOfComposition
Indicates that the precise date when a work was composed is not known.
-
D.
dateOfCompositionHypothesis
Indicates a hypothesized or uncertain date when something (such as a work or document) was composed.
-
E.
approximateDepictionDate
Indicates the estimated or inferred date when a depiction was created, rather than a precise, confirmed date.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34945ae408190b72d8118c83beb77 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fec25f0fc48190b87ab1f9cd1eb0de |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fec079a770819098df7cc3049df954 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:04 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:18 a.m.