Triple

T328835
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IG Farben Trial E6579 entity
Predicate typicalSentenceRange P11478 FINISHED
Object 1.5 to 8 years imprisonment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1.5 to 8 years imprisonment | Statement: [IG Farben Trial, typicalSentenceRange, 1.5 to 8 years imprisonment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalSentenceRange
Context triple: [IG Farben Trial, typicalSentenceRange, 1.5 to 8 years imprisonment]
  • A. sentenceOf
    Indicates that one entity is a sentence that belongs to, is contained in, or is part of another larger text or document.
  • B. sentenceType
    Indicates the classification of a sentence according to its communicative function or structural type (e.g., question, statement, command).
  • C. sentence
    Indicates that one entity is a sentence that expresses, contains, or encodes information about another entity.
  • D. pilotSentence
    Indicates that an entity operates or controls an aircraft or similar vehicle in the context of a described situation or sentence.
  • E. typicalSpeaker
    Indicates that the subject is a prototypical or characteristic speaker or source of utterances in the context of the object.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e7933d6c8190bb2592ad13286ef2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2eaad37b0819085beda2a491da9a8 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e94aab1c8190b8654708c87eeb91 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea09a5e881908b313cb37409a4f9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.