Triple
T32866179
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Would You Rather |
E840654
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGuestVocalRoleFor |
P93602
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Conor Oberst |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Conor Oberst | Statement: [Would You Rather, hasGuestVocalRoleFor, Conor Oberst]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGuestVocalRoleFor Context triple: [Would You Rather, hasGuestVocalRoleFor, Conor Oberst]
-
A.
hasGuestVocalists
chosen
Indicates that one or more guest vocalists perform vocals on a work, performance, or recording in addition to the primary artist(s).
-
B.
hasNotableGuestRole
Indicates that an entity appears in a significant but non-starring guest role in relation to another entity, such as a show, episode, or production.
-
C.
recordingArtistOfGuestVocalist
Indicates that an artist is the primary recording artist on a work that features another artist as a guest vocalist.
-
D.
hasGuestVerseBy
Indicates that a work (such as a song or track) includes a guest verse performed by a specified artist.
-
E.
guestVocalistIsFrontmanOf
Indicates that the guest vocalist performing on a work is also the lead singer (frontman) of the referenced band or primary musical act.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34942465c819099b3fb47f9044f58 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d16f5cb881908eed141afaaa0b51 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe45554819089cbbd538d992132 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:17 a.m.