Triple

T3285907
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hell E68979 entity
Predicate roleInDoctrine P31678 FINISHED
Object deterrent against sin LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: deterrent against sin | Statement: [Hell, roleInDoctrine, deterrent against sin]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInDoctrine
Context triple: [Hell, roleInDoctrine, deterrent against sin]
  • A. doctrineRole chosen
    Indicates the functional role or position an entity holds within a particular doctrine, teaching, or system of belief.
  • B. proposesDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or advocates a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles for consideration or adoption by others.
  • C. definesRole
    Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the role, function, or position of another entity within a given context.
  • D. appliedDoctrine
    Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
  • E. developedDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad859c463481909ca4be267336c290 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb03918c48190987d7cfd3bda9716 completed March 8, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada421fadc8190b7c7d3c8afd20061 completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m.