Triple

T32844200
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hungarian customary law E840050 entity
Predicate continuedInForceUntil P41751 FINISHED
Object 19th century LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 19th century | Statement: [Hungarian customary law, continuedInForceUntil, 19th century]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: continuedInForceUntil
Context triple: [Hungarian customary law, continuedInForceUntil, 19th century]
  • A. continuedRelevanceAfterEndDate
    Indicates that something remains relevant or applicable even after its specified end date has passed.
  • B. endingPeriod
    Indicates that a specified time span or process concludes at the given period or point in time.
  • C. mayRemainInForce
    Indicates that an agreement, rule, or condition is allowed to continue to be valid and effective for a further period of time.
  • D. extendsUntil chosen
    Indicates that something continues or remains in effect up to a specified point or limit in time or space.
  • E. maintainedUntil
    Indicates that a state, condition, or relationship continues to hold true up to a specified endpoint in time, but not necessarily beyond it.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3493ff0888190b51e974eae2a7834 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd0b92f42881908cd77e3f058adcc2 completed May 7, 2026, 10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd0a3d68d4819094d92040f7c48d7c completed May 7, 2026, 9:55 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:16 a.m.