Triple
T32843959
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Surrender at Világos |
E840045
|
entity |
| Predicate | commanderHungarianSide |
P192160
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Artúr Görgei |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Artúr Görgei | Statement: [Surrender at Világos, commanderHungarianSide, Artúr Görgei]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commanderHungarianSide Context triple: [Surrender at Világos, commanderHungarianSide, Artúr Görgei]
-
A.
forcesInvolvedHungarian
Indicates that the relationship specifies which military or other organized forces were involved in an event or operation in the context of Hungary.
-
B.
combatantCommanderAustria
Indicates that the referenced entity served as a military commander for Austria in a particular conflict or combat situation.
-
C.
commandersSide
Indicates that one entity is on the same side, faction, or team as the commander in a conflict or competitive context.
-
D.
PolishCommander
Indicates that an entity serves as a military commander associated with Poland.
-
E.
commanderForSovietSide
Indicates that an entity serves as a military commander representing or leading forces on the Soviet side in a conflict or operation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493ff0888190b51e974eae2a7834 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcf825ca7081909d06b0df33eb33f9 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcf42160f0819096812a8bf590875e |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:20 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcf82405c88190a19cecf8e9cc272d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:16 a.m.