Triple
T32838162
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zrt. |
E839891
|
entity |
| Predicate | commonLawAnalogy |
P10240
|
FINISHED |
| Object | closely held corporation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: closely held corporation | Statement: [Zrt., commonLawAnalogy, closely held corporation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonLawAnalogy Context triple: [Zrt., commonLawAnalogy, closely held corporation]
-
A.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
B.
legalConcept
chosen
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
C.
usesLawTo
Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a specific law as a means or tool to affect, regulate, or influence another entity or situation.
-
D.
civilLawBasedOn
Indicates that a civil law, legal system, or legal provision is derived from, grounded in, or significantly influenced by another specified source of law or legal framework.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493ff0888190b51e974eae2a7834 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe744faca881908e11e90e0a35653f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe734cbf7081909a552c5cf3b5ea59 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:35 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:16 a.m.