Triple
T32838157
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zrt. |
E839891
|
entity |
| Predicate | taxResidence |
P104630
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hungary (if managed and controlled there) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hungary (if managed and controlled there) | Statement: [Zrt., taxResidence, Hungary (if managed and controlled there)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: taxResidence Context triple: [Zrt., taxResidence, Hungary (if managed and controlled there)]
-
A.
taxResidenceDefinedBy
Indicates that an entity’s tax residence status is determined or established according to a specified rule, authority, or defining criterion.
-
B.
countryOfTaxResidence
chosen
Indicates the country in which an entity is legally considered a tax resident and primarily obligated to pay taxes.
-
C.
taxAuthority
Indicates that an entity serves as the official body responsible for assessing, collecting, and enforcing taxes over another entity or within a jurisdiction.
-
D.
hasBranchResidenceIn
Indicates that an organization maintains a branch or subsidiary located in a specified place or jurisdiction.
-
E.
taxingJurisdiction
Indicates the authority or region that has the legal power to impose and collect taxes on a given entity or transaction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493ff0888190b51e974eae2a7834 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ce6d659881909ddcec1d2966e020 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cc1667a48190b42684f6ec22dae9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:16 a.m.