Triple
T32825844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Henkin semantics |
E839552
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | semantics for first-order logic |
C21783
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: semantics for first-order logic Context triple: [Henkin semantics, instanceOf, semantics for first-order logic]
-
A.
formal logic
chosen
Formal logic is the systematic study of valid reasoning and inference using precisely defined symbols, rules, and structures independent of specific content.
-
B.
nonclassical logic semantics
Nonclassical logic semantics is the study of meaning and truth conditions for logics that deviate from classical principles, such as by altering truth values, inference rules, or structural constraints.
-
C.
possible‑worlds semantics
Possible-worlds semantics is a formal framework in logic and linguistics that interprets the meaning of sentences by evaluating their truth across a range of alternative, systematically structured possible worlds.
-
D.
theory of predication
The theory of predication is a philosophical account of how properties, relations, or attributes are meaningfully ascribed to subjects in propositions, explaining the structure and truth-conditions of statements like “S is P.”
-
E.
theory of sense and reference
The theory of sense and reference is a philosophical framework, originating with Frege, that distinguishes between the meaning or mode of presentation of an expression (sense) and the actual object or truth-value it stands for (reference) to explain how language conveys information and supports rational thought.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3493f22f88190ae6dd4bc15b6cf8d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:15 a.m.