Triple

T32824100
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mono-ha artists E839506 entity
Predicate artHistoricalRelation P128919 FINISHED
Object related to Arte Povera LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: related to Arte Povera | Statement: [Mono-ha artists, artHistoricalRelation, related to Arte Povera]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: artHistoricalRelation
Context triple: [Mono-ha artists, artHistoricalRelation, related to Arte Povera]
  • A. artHistoricalFunction
    Indicates the role or purpose an artwork serves within its historical, cultural, or stylistic context.
  • B. artHistoricalReference chosen
    Indicates that one entity makes reference to, is inspired by, or explicitly alludes to another entity within an art-historical context.
  • C. associatedWithWorkOfArt
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected or related to a specific work of art, such as through creation, contribution, ownership, or contextual association.
  • D. appearsInWorkOfArt
    Indicates that an entity is depicted, represented, or otherwise featured within a particular work of art.
  • E. artHistoricalInterpretation
    Indicates an interpretive relationship where an artwork is analyzed or explained through art-historical methods, theories, or contextual understanding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3493df9008190a8f5d843dcd77704 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6ce6d659881909ddcec1d2966e020 completed May 3, 2026, 4:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6cc1667a48190b42684f6ec22dae9 completed May 3, 2026, 4:16 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:15 a.m.